What You Should Know

An AI-generated overview of this parcel — zoning context, recent activity, and what matters most for redevelopment.

Zoning & Land Use

Zoning DistrictCMX3 - Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Building TypeROW 3 STY MASONRY

CategorySINGLE FAMILY

Year Built1925 (est.)

Valuation & Sales

Market Value (TY2027)$193,500

Last Sale Price$1

Last Sale DateNovember 13, 1959

Taxable Land$38,700

Taxable Building$54,800

Homestead Exemption$100,000

Physical Characteristics

Total Lot Area2,144 sq ft

Livable Area1,760 sq ft

Frontage16 ft

Depth134 ft

Stories3

Units1

Bedrooms0

Bathrooms0

Exterior ConditionAverage

GarageN/A

Ownership

OwnerWayne Astor Thompson

Owner 2Willa Mae-

Political Representation

City Council DistrictN/A

City Council MemberN/A

Ward60

PA House DistrictN/A

PA House RepresentativeN/A

PA Senate DistrictN/A

PA Senate RepresentativeN/A

Congressional DistrictN/A

Congressional RepresentativeN/A

Census Tract84

Activity Timeline

Nearby Activity

Comparable Sales

Two different questions, answered together: what this property is worth as built, and what the land underneath it is worth on its own. Not an appraisal.

Building value

Arm's-length sales of similar nearby homes — prices the structure.

Land value

Vacant-land and teardown sales — prices the lot on its own.

Sale-by-sale detail

Buildable CapacityBeta

CMX-3Commercial Mixed-Use

Zoning Envelope

Max Height: No limit
Lot Coverage: 75%
FAR: 5.0x; 500%
Max GFA: 10,720 sf
Max Units: 14; FAR-based

Mixed-Income Bonus (§14-702 — Elective, Current Law)

Available if the project provides moderate-income units under §14-702(7). Floor-area track, moderate-income tier; exempt from the §14-702(4) bonus cap (§14-702(4)(i)).

Bonus Floor Area: +3,216 sf; 150% of lot area
With All Bonuses: Max Units: 18; Base 14 + 4 Mixed-Income

What This Lot Can Hold (Current Law)

Option	Units	Floor area	Height	Cost per unit	Rent needed
By right §14-701 base zoning	14	10,720 sf	—	$261k–$264k land $4k–$6k	$1,810–$1,830 1.15×–1.17× area
With the Mixed-Income bonus §14-702 Mixed-Income Housing, moderate-income tier · requires affordable units	18	13,936 sf	—	$261k–$263k land $3k–$5k	$1,870–$1,880 1.18×–1.19× area

Break-even density: Doesn't pencil at any legal density. Even the densest option (with the Mixed-Income bonus, 18 units) needs rents 18%–19% above the area's.

Beyond current law (hypothetical)

Rezoned to CMX-5

34 units

14 stories

elevator may not fit

$1,770–$1,780

1.14×–1.15× area

None of these pencil either. The closest is rezoned to CMX-5 (34 units, 14 stories), at 1.15× the area's rent. An elevator is needed at this height and may not fit on a lot this narrow.

Not current law. "Same footprint" adds floors to the densest legal option, up to six stories, the most wood over a podium allows before concrete. Rezonings use that district's best current-law option on this lot. Construction above four stories is priced at 1.13× wood frame for wood over a podium and 1.28× for concrete.

Rent needed vs. what the area pays

By right

$1,810–$1,830 vs $1,570

With the Mixed-Income bonus

$1,870–$1,880 vs $1,590

Rezoned to CMX-5

$1,770–$1,780 vs $1,550

what a new building here gets LIHTC rent cap, 60% AMI ($1,540) pencils only if land is cheap doesn't

Bars are the monthly rent per market-rate unit each option needs to pencil, from the low to the high end of the land price. The market tick is Zillow's rent for the area with the new-building premium. Zillow rents trail the market and blend all bedroom sizes, while rent needed uses this building's own units, so the comparison is approximate on the market side. Light rows are hypothetical, not current law.

Land: $27,090–$61,920 — the city's assessed land value, 0.7×–1.6×, where half of recent lot sales landed against it. The assessment is a fixed share of total value, not a land price; enter a better figure if you have one

Use my land price:

Cost per unit is land, construction and soft costs from the pro forma at each option's units, floor area and construction type, divided by its units. Rent needed is the average monthly rent per market-rate unit for a 6.0% yield on cost, the pro forma's "pencils" line, against what a new building in the area would get (neighborhood rent with the new-building premium, at delivery). On the Mixed-Income option the affordable units stay at their 60% AMI rent. Planning-level only, like the pro forma.

Elective: the project must provide moderate-income units under §14-702(7).

Building Code (IBC Ch. 5)

Construction Type: Type IV-C; mass timber · ~$138/sf base
Stories to Realize FAR: ~7; No height cap — FAR ÷ coverage
Net Realizable Units: 14; 80% net-to-gross vs. 14 gross

Realizing this zoning envelope needs about 7 stories — above the 4-story wood-frame limit — so it requires Type IV-C (noncombustible or mass timber). Zoning permits the density; the building code raises the hard cost to reach it.

Model a specific massing to see the construction type it requires (zoning capacity above is unchanged):

StoriesFloor plate (SF)

By-right capacity based on Philadelphia Zoning Code §14-701. Actual development potential may vary based on overlays, variances, setbacks, parking requirements, and site conditions.Utilization and redevelopment potential data will be available after the next data update.

Bonuses and Policy ScenariosBeta

Toggle a bonus or policy scenario to see how it affects feasibility. Selections here update the Pro Forma card below, including its Excel export. Not law today scenarios are hypothetical only — not something available under current Philadelphia zoning code.

Select a scenario above to compare against the base case

3D Massing

Development Pro FormaBeta

Yield on cost:−Doesn't Pencil10-yr IRR:−Doesn't Pencil

Market data: Citywide submarket

Total Dev Cost

$3.8M

$273,895/unit

Stabilized NOI

$183K

Yield on Cost

4.8%

Below 6% threshold

Equity Multiple

1.14x

14 units / Type I/II Concrete/Steel

Revenue

Gross Potential Rent$264K

Blended Market Rent (at delivery)$2.56/sf/mo

Parking Income$6K

Effective Gross Income$250K

Development Cost

Land & Acquisition$65K

Hard Costs$2.7M

Soft Costs$1.1M

Total Development Cost$3.8M

10-yr IRR

1.5%

Below 15% threshold

Cash-on-Cash

2.1%

DSCR

1.18x

Target: 1.20x+

Year 10 NOI

$192K

Net Sale Proceeds

$1.2M

at 6.5% cap

LIHTC Screening Beta

Not Applicable

Screening-level LIHTC feasibility based on the market-rate pro forma above. Not a substitute for a qualified LIHTC consultant.

Income Mix Preset

30/50/60% AMI — strong PHFA scoring

Affordable %

Investor $/Credit

Grants / Subsidies

Receives federal assistanceHOME, CDBG, HOPWA, HTF, project-based vouchers. Triggers §504 (5% accessible + 2% hearing/vision). The credit alone does not.Elevator buildingBrings every unit into Type B scope instead of the ground floor only. Defaulted from the modeled story count.

Prevailing wageApplies once a project receives $100K+ in city financial assistance (e.g. City Gap Financing, the typical LIHTC subsidy source).Land Bank disposition ($1 nominal)Models this parcel as if acquired via the Land Bank at nominal cost — not yet an active City program for LIHTC deals.

9% Annual Credit

$367K

$3.3M total equity

4% Annual Credit

$163K

$1.5M total equity

Eligible Basis

$4.1M

100.0% applicable

Surplus (9%)

$1.1M

Fully funded

Recommendation

Only 14 units — PHFA minimum for 9% is 25 units. Too small for bond-financed 4% deal as well.

Income Averaging (IRC §42(g)(1)(C))

Compliant

Avg AMI: 52.9% (max 60%)

Affordable Units: 14 / 14

Applicable Fraction: 100.0%

Sources of Funds

LIHTC Equity (9%)

$3,304,638

Permanent Debt

$1,988,215

Total Sources$5,292,853

Surplus$1,148,194

Accessibility requirements14 units

Type A (fully adaptable)

IBC §1107.6.2.2.1 — 2% above 20 units

none

Type B / Fair Housing

IBC §1107.6.2.2.2 — elevator brings all units into scope

§504 mobility-accessible

not applied — no federal assistance declared

n/a

§504 hearing / vision

not applied — no federal assistance declared

n/a

QCT/DDA 130% basis boost not yet implemented — check HUD QCT map manually.

100% affordable — eligible for landscape buffer exemption (§14-705(1)), reducing site costs.